Assessing the Utility of Consumer Surveys for Improving the Quality of Behavioral Health Care Services

Abstract

The development and implementation of provider performance and consumer outcome measures for behavioral health care have been growing over the last decade, presumably because they are useful tools for improving service quality. However, the extent to which providers have successfully used performance measurement results has not been adequately determined. To this end, two methods were used to better understand the use of data obtained from an annual survey of behavioral health care consumers: a cross-sectional survey of executive directors, clinical program directors, and quality improvement directors and follow-up interviews with a subsample of survey respondents. Results revealed information about the use of consumer survey data, factors that facilitate and hinder the use of results, as well as respondents' opinions about consumer survey administration procedures. These findings provide valuable information for the application of performance measures and, ultimately, improving consumer outcomes.

Measuring Quality of Care in Community Mental Health: Validation of Concordant Clinician and Client Quality-of-Care Scales

“…For example, clinicians and clients could concurrently complete and discuss the quality of care scales during treatment plan updates or during the completion of performance measures. 63 …”

Understanding and Using Patient Experience Feedback to Improve Health Care Quality: Systematic Review and Framework Development

“…Approximately 42% (n=5) of the studies were conducted in the United States, while the remaining 58% (n=7) were carried out in Europe. Publication dates of the 12 papers ranged from 2003 to 2013 (Table 1 [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] ).…”

“…• Benchmarking: Two studies 13,14 reported that survey findings were examined against results of other organizations and agencies.…”

“…Two studies 13,14 indicated that organizations compared results with prior survey findings and examined trends. • Follow-Up Data: Four studies [14][15][16][17] indicated that additional data were gathered to further understand patient perspectives.…”

Key performance indicators for mental health and substance use disorders: a literature review and discussion paper

“…This change in focus means that indicators which were once designed to measure at the institutional level must now also be reflective of the community level (Sandoval et al, 2012). All of this best practice information has created a substantial change in the structure of mental and substance use disorder care delivery in Canada and the VHA, and has also persuaded Ireland's HSE to consider a similar restructuring from inpatient to outpatient primary care services (Government of -14 - Table 2, may not be effectively captured as this data is often collected via survey/audit (Koch, Breland, Nash, & Cropsey, 2011). Furthermore, uploading of diagnosis-based events may not capture more subtle interventions within the encounter.…”