2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00284-023-03461-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Utility of Multiplexed Polymerase Chain Reaction in Detecting Microorganisms Causing Infections in Critically ill Patients

Pedro Garrido,
Xavier Gabaldó-Barrios,
Isabel Pujol-Bajador
et al.

Abstract: Early sepsis diagnosis is crucial for implementing adequate antibiotic therapy and for patient survival. This study investigated whether using multiplexed PCR for detecting microorganisms in critical septic patients affects initial antibiotic treatment and compared it to microbiological culture. It also explored scenarios where PCR is more effective in clinical practice. One hundred nineteen specimens (83 blood and 36 respiratory specimens) belonging to 93 patients were analyzed. Multiplexed PCR determinations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since intraabdominal infections are mostly polymicrobial, this is to be expected. This is in line with current literature, as other studies had similar result in PCR based testing in blood samples and stool samples [ 40 , 41 ]. Since all microorganisms in the sample are reported, interpretating these results is important to differentiate which microorganisms are pathogens and which are commensals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Since intraabdominal infections are mostly polymicrobial, this is to be expected. This is in line with current literature, as other studies had similar result in PCR based testing in blood samples and stool samples [ 40 , 41 ]. Since all microorganisms in the sample are reported, interpretating these results is important to differentiate which microorganisms are pathogens and which are commensals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%