78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016 2016
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201601449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Validity and Limitations of Dual-porosity Models Using Geological Well Testing for Fractured Formations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented workflow enables fast generation of highly detailed realistic fracture networks for use of geomechanical and flow modelling, variations of which have been applied to study different aspects of fracture and fracturematrix flow (e.g. Aljuboori et al, 2015;Arnold et al, 2016;Bisdom et al, 2016c;Egya et al, 2016;Muhammad, 2016;Shah et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presented workflow enables fast generation of highly detailed realistic fracture networks for use of geomechanical and flow modelling, variations of which have been applied to study different aspects of fracture and fracturematrix flow (e.g. Aljuboori et al, 2015;Arnold et al, 2016;Bisdom et al, 2016c;Egya et al, 2016;Muhammad, 2016;Shah et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These flow models also help to identify different fracture-matrix permeability domains, which can be used to better characterise fractured reservoir flow domains. To further bridge the gap between discrete fracture models and reservoir-scale continuum models, hybrid upscaling techniques can be used (Egya et al, 2016;Shah et al, 2016).…”
Section: Lessons For Reservoir-scale Flow Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%