1995
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1995.1044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Validity and Reliability of Contingent Values: A Comparison of On-Site Users, Off-Site Users, and Non-users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…e.g. Boyle et al 1993;Whitehead et al 1995;Cameron and Englin 1997;Czajkowski et al 2015). Furthermore, most of the focus is on the internal validity driven by the comparison of different designs.…”
Section: Survey Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g. Boyle et al 1993;Whitehead et al 1995;Cameron and Englin 1997;Czajkowski et al 2015). Furthermore, most of the focus is on the internal validity driven by the comparison of different designs.…”
Section: Survey Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Whitehead et al (1995) [58], the mid-and downstream on-site users of water from the Paldang Lake in the Han River basin are surveyed in this study. This is based on their acquaintance with the goods, and also with the fact that the WTPs of on-site users are more reliable because non-users do not take into account their income constraints when presenting their WTP.…”
Section: Contingent Valuation Scenarios and Target Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite attempts to provide information on the goods in question during the course of a valuation survey, a lack of experience has for many years been recognised as a significant reliability problem in SP studies (e.g. Whitehead et al, 1995) with low experience being associated with framing effects and related preference anomalies (Boyle et al, 1993;Bateman et al, 2008).…”
Section: Modelling Change In Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%