2010
DOI: 10.1093/socrel/srq064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Validity of Key Informant Reports about Congregations' Social Composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used multiple approaches to identify and reach as many congregations as possible, but we probably missed some small, less active congregations, and those with few resources and less established religions/theologies. Also, while key informants tend to report accurately on most measures, they are less accurate in reporting a congregation's social composition [39]. Furthermore, this study did not account for religious leaders’ characteristics, especially their educational credentials, and ability to mobilize volunteers to influence health programming [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used multiple approaches to identify and reach as many congregations as possible, but we probably missed some small, less active congregations, and those with few resources and less established religions/theologies. Also, while key informants tend to report accurately on most measures, they are less accurate in reporting a congregation's social composition [39]. Furthermore, this study did not account for religious leaders’ characteristics, especially their educational credentials, and ability to mobilize volunteers to influence health programming [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each congregation, we identified and interviewed a key informant—a clergy or an administrative staff person with tenure of at least 3 months, preferably salaried—as key informants provide the most valid assessments when asked about observable congregational characteristics [39]. The study was approved by the University of Cincinnati Institutional Review Board.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the propensity of key informants to overestimate the similarity of opinions within an organization, the key informant may not know what is actually taking place within the congregation, or the key informant may be simply reporting what the congregation's ideal stance would be. Researchers should keep these weaknesses in mind and interpret the results of this study cautiously (Frenk et al ; Schwadel and Dougherty ). However, while such loose coupling between what the key informant is reporting and what is actually taking place within the congregation may exist, there is evidence for the reliability of the key informant strategy, especially concerning the NCS (see Beyerlein and Chaves ; Chaves et al ; Frenk et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers should keep these weaknesses in mind and interpret the results of this study cautiously (Frenk et al ; Schwadel and Dougherty ). However, while such loose coupling between what the key informant is reporting and what is actually taking place within the congregation may exist, there is evidence for the reliability of the key informant strategy, especially concerning the NCS (see Beyerlein and Chaves ; Chaves et al ; Frenk et al ). Furthermore, while the key informant methodology utilized in the NCS‐II is not without weakness, the NCS‐II is still a significant source of information concerning the stances American congregations take concerning the inclusion of gays and lesbians.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visible activities, such as voting drives, are likely recalled with higher consistency by informants than clergy speech (Chaves et al. ; Djupe and Gilbert ; Schwadel and Dougherty ; Frenk, Anderson, and Martin ). Second, a hypernetwork sample requires adjustment for the size of organizations since larger organizations are more likely to be nominated.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%