2015
DOI: 10.1002/jaba.207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the value of token reinforcement for individuals with autism

Abstract: The use of token systems has been supported across a variety of populations, but little research has evaluated the reinforcing value of token systems for individuals with autism. We used progressive-ratio schedules to compare the reinforcing value of an established token system, primary reinforcement, and tokens unpaired with reinforcement. Token systems were variably reinforcing for 2 students with autism and more so than primary reinforcement for 1 student. Results support formal assessment of the effectiven… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
20
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
20
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study overlap significantly with those of Fiske et al (). Both studies indicate that token systems can have similar effects to primary reinforcement for some learners.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The findings of this study overlap significantly with those of Fiske et al (). Both studies indicate that token systems can have similar effects to primary reinforcement for some learners.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The current study used a task similar to Cividini‐Motta and Ahearn and found the MSA to be suitable to determine the relative reinforcing efficacy of tokens and other social consequences. The current study also addressed a limitation of Fiske et al’s () study by using the MSA as an expedient alternative to the PR reinforcer assessment for the evaluation of tokens. The duration of the MSA assessment in the current study ranged from 26 to 36 min, whereas the duration of the PR assessment in Fiske et al ranged from 1 hr 28 min to 2 hr 29 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations