1995
DOI: 10.1108/10610429510097636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the vulnerability of private label brands

Abstract: Private label brands may be in danger as a result of recent changes in the marketing strategies used by private label firms. The primary competitive advantage of private label brands, good quality at low prices, may be lost if private label firms continue to modify and expand how their brands are marketed. Specifically, changes in private label brands′ advertising, packaging, sales promotion, and product improvement strategies indicate that private label brands are moving closer than ever to manufacturer brand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A company's benefits and drawbacks as the result of a pursued strategy is represented either as a positive (that is ''+'', which identifies a perceived benefit) or a negative (that is ''-'', which indicates a perceived drawback). All the strategic actions pursued by the companies identified in this investigation were also identified in previous research (see, for example, Glemet and Mira, 1993;Halstead and Ward, 1995;Hoch, 1996;Miller, 1995;Montezemolo, 1997;Parker and Kim, 1995;Quelch and Harding, 1996).…”
Section: Mrn 312 132mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A company's benefits and drawbacks as the result of a pursued strategy is represented either as a positive (that is ''+'', which identifies a perceived benefit) or a negative (that is ''-'', which indicates a perceived drawback). All the strategic actions pursued by the companies identified in this investigation were also identified in previous research (see, for example, Glemet and Mira, 1993;Halstead and Ward, 1995;Hoch, 1996;Miller, 1995;Montezemolo, 1997;Parker and Kim, 1995;Quelch and Harding, 1996).…”
Section: Mrn 312 132mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The main advantages are that excess manufacturing capacity is utilized (cf. Glemet and Mira, 1993;Halstead and Ward, 1995;Hoch, 1996;Quelch and Harding, 1996), the manufacturer-distributor relationship is strengthened (Hoch, 1996) and competition by private label brands is reduced since it indirectly assists in keeping the prices of manufacturer brands at a low level (Halstead and Ward, 1995). In addition, by producing private labels, production experience is increased and both the unit manufacturing and distribution costs are lowered.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mudanças ocorridas nas empresas que possuem marcas próprias podem representar uma ameaça estratégica na medida em que as marcas próprias começam a se mover para um status de marca de fabricante (HALSTEAD; WARD, 1995). A incorporação de muitas funções pelo distribuidor pode tornar a estratégia não mais desejável.…”
Section: B) Desvantagensunclassified