2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the vulnerability of water resources in the context of climate changes in a small forested watershed using SWAT: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Global warming as a result of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases might reduce water security in near future (Arnell and Reynard, 1996; Zhang et al ., 2010; Cuo et al ., 2015; Marin et al ., 2020), due to expected decreases in precipitation, surface runoff, and actual evapotranspiration (Zhang et al ., 2010; Haddeland et al ., 2012; Cuo et al ., 2015; Pervez and Henebry, 2015). According to Estrela et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Global warming as a result of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases might reduce water security in near future (Arnell and Reynard, 1996; Zhang et al ., 2010; Cuo et al ., 2015; Marin et al ., 2020), due to expected decreases in precipitation, surface runoff, and actual evapotranspiration (Zhang et al ., 2010; Haddeland et al ., 2012; Cuo et al ., 2015; Pervez and Henebry, 2015). According to Estrela et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) developed four climate change scenarios, representing four radiative forcing target levels until 2,100 (RCP 2.6, 4.5, 6.0 and 8.5) (Meinshausen et al ., 2011; Taylor et al ., 2012). These scenarios have previously been applied in several studies involving emissions mitigation and analysis of climate change impacts (Van Vuuren et al ., 2011; Chou et al ., 2014a; Oliveira et al ., 2017; Senent‐Aparicio et al ., 2017; Shiferaw et al ., 2018; Santos et al ., 2019; Sousa et al ., 2019; Marin et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 4 shows the parameter ranges and the final calibrated values for each of the reanalysis products. Among the calibrated parameters-and as demonstrated by the sensitivity analysis, CN2 was one of the most sensitive parameters as it is directly related to runoff generation [67,68]. We thus expected that the calibrated CN2 values would be substantially reduced to correct the overestimation of precipitation as detected using the reanalysis data, with the expected reduction being between 11.7% and 19.9%.…”
Section: Model Calibration Using Glofas Discharge Datamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The SWAT model with a strong physical foundation is mainly used to simulate soil erosion [26,27], non-point source pollution [28,29], agricultural management measures [30,31], etc. Suitable for watersheds with different land use types [32], soil types [33] and topographic conditions [34], it can simulate areas with insufficient data, thus meeting the data richness requirements of traditional hydrological models and satisfying the requirements of simulation accuracy [35,36]. Many investigations are available which have analyzed the effects of land use change on runoff and sediment process simulation by the SWAT model [37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%