Weed interference consistently poses a significant agronomic challenge in cotton production, leading to unfavorable direct and indirect consequences. Consequently, the predominant strategy employed to manage weeds is the application of synthetic herbicides. However, this extensive reliance has resulted in the development of herbicide-resistant weed populations due to the prolonged use of a single herbicide and the lack of rotation. This project focused on identifying weed-suppressive cotton chromosome substitution (CS) lines. These CS lines closely resemble the parent TM-1, an upland cotton derivative (Gossypium hirsutum). Each CS line carries a single chromosome or chromosome arm exchanged from G. barbadense, G. tomentosum, or G. mustelinum within the TM-1 background. In a greenhouse experiment utilizing a stepwise approach, five CS lines, along with two conventional varieties (Enlist and UA48) and the parent line (TM1), were assessed to determine their potential for suppressing Palmer amaranth growth. The plant height was measured 7, 14, and 21 days after establishment, and the chlorophyll content was measured 21 days after establishment. The results revealed varying levels of chlorophyll reduction in Palmer amaranth, with the Enlist variety displaying the lowest reduction (32%) and TM-1 exhibiting the highest (78%). Within 14 days of establishment, the CS lines T26lo, BNTN 1-15, and T11sh demonstrated substantial suppression of Palmer amaranth height, with reductions of 79, 70, and 71%, respectively. Conversely, Enlist displayed the least effective performance among the CS lines. Moreover, CS22, CS49, CS50, CS34, UA48, and CS23 displayed a decreasing trend in reducing Palmer amaranth height from 14 to 21 days after establishment. This research demonstrates the inherent herbicidal attributes within cotton CS lines against Palmer amaranth. In light of the versatile applications of cotton fibers and the unique characteristics of the G. hirsutum genome, this study investigates the potential of specific cotton lines in enhancing weed management practices. By elucidating the implications of our findings, we aim to contribute to promoting sustainability and developing alternatives to synthetic herbicides in agricultural systems.