Assessing the Wraparound Process During Family Planning Meetings

Epstein, Michael H.; Nordness, Philip D.; Kutash, Krista; Duchnowski, Al; Schrepf, Sheryl; Benner, Greg J.; Nelson, J. Ron

doi:10.1097/00075484-200307000-00008

Cited by 15 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is consistent with the growing body of work suggesting that service providers have difficulty implementing key aspects of wraparound (e.g., Bertram et al 2011;Bruns and Walker 2011a;Cook et al 2007;Epstein et al 2003;Palamaro Munsell et al 2011;Walker et al 2003;Walker and Schutte 2005). These works demonstrate that practices both during and following federal funding often do not match the values and principles disseminated regarding the desirable components and foci of SOCs; many communities struggle to engage in practices that align well with the SOC philosophy and wraparound (see, e.g., CMHS 2003; Cook and Kilmer 2004;Holden et al 2003;Kutash et al 2011;Lunn et al 2011;Pandiani et al 1996).…”

Section: The Disconnect Between Soc Theory and Practicesupporting

confidence: 84%

Systems of Care: New Partnerships for Community Psychology

Cook

Kilmer

2012

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For almost two decades, the federal government has supported the development of integrated models of mental health service delivery for children and families, known as systems of care (SOCs), that strive to be child-centered, family-focused, community-based, and culturally competent. These efforts align well with the values and principles (e.g., empowerment, collaboration, strengths emphasis, focus on macro-level social/system change) central to community psychology (CP; Kloos et al. in Community psychology, Cengage Learning, Belmont, 2012). Despite the convergence of many core values, CPs have historically been underrepresented in key roles in SOC initiatives. However, this has changed in recent years, with increasing examples of community psychology skills and principles applied to the development, implementation, and evaluation of SOCs. Because successful and sustainable implementation of SOCs requires community and system-level change, and SOCs are increasingly being urged to adopt a stronger "public health" orientation (Miles et al. in A public health approach to children's mental health: a conceptual framework, Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development, National Technical Assistance Center for Children's Mental Health, Washington, DC, 2010), there is great potential for CPs to play important roles in SOCs. This paper discusses opportunities and roles for CPs in SOCs in applied research and evaluation, community practice, and training.

show abstract

Section: The Disconnect Between Soc Theory and Practicesupporting

confidence: 84%

Systems of Care: New Partnerships for Community Psychology

Cook

Kilmer

2012

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, theory-based tools used in these studies were not validated (Bertram and Bertram 2004;Malysiak 1997Malysiak et al 1998;Malysiak-Bertram et al 2000). Subsequent literature related to model fidelity has focused upon development, validation, and use of tools to measure adherence to wraparound principles including publications on development and use of the Wraparound Observation Form (Epstein et al 2003) and the Wraparound Fidelity Index (Bruns et al 2004a;Bruns et al 2005;Bruns et al 2008).…”

Section: Model Fidelity Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation Research and Wraparound Literature: Building a Research Agenda

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We used the framework identified by the National Implementation Research Network's (NIRN) analysis of 35 years of implementation outcomes literature from diverse fields of endeavor to review the current state of wraparound implementation research. Model definition, model fidelity and intervention outcomes were areas of relatively greater development, while target population, theory base and theory of change, organizational context and readiness, staff selection, training, supervision or coaching, purveyor selection, and program installation were less examined or even overlooked. We conclude with suggestions for building a research agenda on wraparound implementation.

show abstract

“…Lack of informal support participation is common in wraparound programs. 45 Nonetheless, as with wraparound programs for younger youth, this would seem to be an area for improvement for wraparound implementation in transition services, especially given the critical role that nonrelated, unpaid "very important people" 46 can play among youth at risk for poor transition outcomes.…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

Wraparound Team Composition, Youth Self-determination, and Youth Satisfaction in Transition Services

LaPorte

Haber

Malloy

2014

J Behav Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wraparound, a team-based planning process for youth and families, has been widely adopted in school-based services for older adolescents and emerging adults with serious mental health conditions transitioning to adulthood. Reservations have been voiced, however, regarding possible drawbacks of teams for these youth, including concerns about difficulties with involving supportive adults, and whether youth might perceive team-based planning as a threat to their developing autonomy. To date, however, no studies have examined the feasibility of involving supports in teams and relationships between team composition and youth's service experiences. The present study examined the relationships between team composition and youth's perceptions of self-determination and service satisfaction among 36 youths in seven school-based programs using a specialized form of wraparound for transition services. Findings showed that meeting participation by caregivers and professionals from both inside and outside of schools was common and that regular participation by combinations of these types of adults was related to youth self-determination and satisfaction.

show abstract

Assessing the Wraparound Process During Family Planning Meetings

Cited by 15 publications

References 17 publications

Systems of Care: New Partnerships for Community Psychology

Systems of Care: New Partnerships for Community Psychology

Implementation Research and Wraparound Literature: Building a Research Agenda

Wraparound Team Composition, Youth Self-determination, and Youth Satisfaction in Transition Services

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About