2021
DOI: 10.3390/land10020152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Tradeoffs between Development and Conservation: A Case of Land Use Change in a National Park of Korea

Abstract: Protected areas are places that provide diverse ecosystem services, including cultural ecosystem services. At the same time, the development and unbalanced use of natural resources in protected areas often create environmental threats and social conflicts. This study estimates the economic value of environmental consequences derived from the construction of an airport in a national park in Korea. We employ a discrete choice experiment to assess economic values and consider a key part of the tradeoffs derived f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the larger-scale repercussions of climate change are being superimposed on existing human-generated habitat loss and animal and plant extinctions. Decision-making for conservation has thus become increasingly complex [67,83]. These broader issues prompt rising concern about identifying the most effective management structures for sustaining biophysical environments in heavily utilised protected areas suffering from inadequate resourcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the larger-scale repercussions of climate change are being superimposed on existing human-generated habitat loss and animal and plant extinctions. Decision-making for conservation has thus become increasingly complex [67,83]. These broader issues prompt rising concern about identifying the most effective management structures for sustaining biophysical environments in heavily utilised protected areas suffering from inadequate resourcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%