2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing tradeoffs in the design of climate change adaptation strategies for water utilities in Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between structural and non-structural measures relies on the fact that the former requires significant investments and generates lasting, sometimes permanent changes. At the same time, the latter presents the advantage of guaranteeing access to water in acute episodes while eluding significant investments, which could end up underused in favourable climate circumstances 56 . In line with the abovementioned need to enhance the participation of different stakeholders and promote citizen participation, various studies have also analysed this issue from the governance perspective, either focusing on improving management, monitoring, and supervision by authorities or aiming to improve water management by promoting citizen participation and engagement 57 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between structural and non-structural measures relies on the fact that the former requires significant investments and generates lasting, sometimes permanent changes. At the same time, the latter presents the advantage of guaranteeing access to water in acute episodes while eluding significant investments, which could end up underused in favourable climate circumstances 56 . In line with the abovementioned need to enhance the participation of different stakeholders and promote citizen participation, various studies have also analysed this issue from the governance perspective, either focusing on improving management, monitoring, and supervision by authorities or aiming to improve water management by promoting citizen participation and engagement 57 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal is to use the most sustainable strategies to maximize benefits and system effectiveness, while minimizing costs and trade-offs (United Nations Water 2021). Ricalde et al (2022) note that non-structural responses can offer positive results under uncertain conditions compared to structural responses which have higher irreversible costs. Therefore, adaptation remains a key driver in responding to climate change in the water sector.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been proposed to enable planning under deep uncertainty 26,30 ; these allow designing robust and flexible plans that maximize resilience and minimize investment costs on the basis of, for example, adaptation tipping points 31 , dynamic adaptive planning 32 and dynamic adaptive policy pathways 24,33 . Several recent studies have applied such adaptive methods to planning water resource systems in various contexts 25,[34][35][36][37][38] . For instance, a reservoir adaptive planning framework has been developed to explicitly consider learning about climate uncertainty over time 35 , and other studies have optimized the indicators, actions and/or thresholds in the design process of adaptive plans for water resource systems 33,36,39,40 .…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%