1993
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.56.8.868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing tremor severity.

Abstract: A clinical rating scale which measured the severity of tremor in 20 patients (12 with essential tremor and 8 with "dystonic" tremor) was assessed at specific anatomical sites for both inter and intrarater reliability using four raters. The scores obtained with the scale were compared with the results of upper limb accelerometry, an activity of daily living self-questionnaire and estimates of the tremor induced impairment in writing and drawing specimens. The results show that, for the purposes of routine asses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
328
0
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 396 publications
(340 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
328
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bain scale (Bain et al., 1993) evaluated severity of patient's head, voice tremors, and postural tremor of the both upper and lower limbs. The modified FTM rating scale (Elble et al., 2006) graded severity of the tremor during daily life activities, specifically finger‐ and dot‐pointing, Archimedes spiral drawing, drawing of a straight line and sine wave, handwriting, and water pouring for both hands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bain scale (Bain et al., 1993) evaluated severity of patient's head, voice tremors, and postural tremor of the both upper and lower limbs. The modified FTM rating scale (Elble et al., 2006) graded severity of the tremor during daily life activities, specifically finger‐ and dot‐pointing, Archimedes spiral drawing, drawing of a straight line and sine wave, handwriting, and water pouring for both hands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tukey post-hoc comparisons indicate that the mean spiral score (mean ± SD; [95% CI for mean]) in DYS state (5.2 ± 1.8; [5.12, 5.28]) was higher than the mean spiral score in OFF (4.3 ± 1.7; [4.22, 4.37]) and ON (4.2 ± 1.7; [4.17,4.29]) states (Fig 2). The mean spiral score was also significantly different among individual TRS values of slightly 'off' (4.02 ± 1.63), 'on' (4.07 ± 1.65) and slightly 'dyskinetic' (4.6 ± 1.71), (p<0.001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spirals were processed by a computer-based method that generates a "spiral score" representing the PDrelated drawing impairment [3]. The scale for the score was based on a modified Bain & Findley rating scale [4] in the range from 0 = no impairment to 5 = moderate impairment to 10 = extremely severe impairment (Fig 1b). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disto, este método não avalia o tremor postural de membros superiores 1 . Já os aparelhos de detecção ou interrupção de luz, como os goniômetros de luz polarizada são de difícil obtenção.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Sua compreensão fica muito mais acessível para a maioria dos médicos, e até mesmo para os próprios pacientes. Para propósito de avaliação de ensaios clínicos a escala produz resultados confiáveis 1 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified