2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2012.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing user-specific difficulty of documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By building on the CHV project, several studies have proposed predictive models for measuring the average familiarity of various consumer health vocabularies based on term occurrence in text corpora [ 14 ], demographics factors [ 15 ], and contextual features [ 16 , 17 ]. In attempts to provide more consumer-friendly health materials, other researchers have developed automated tools for assessing the readability of health texts by substituting difficult terms with easier synonyms and simplifying long sentences [ 18 ] or by comparing the terms appeared in a document and terms known by the user [ 19 ]. Another study to improve the availability of consumer-friendly information is the consumer health educational project by European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI) [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By building on the CHV project, several studies have proposed predictive models for measuring the average familiarity of various consumer health vocabularies based on term occurrence in text corpora [ 14 ], demographics factors [ 15 ], and contextual features [ 16 , 17 ]. In attempts to provide more consumer-friendly health materials, other researchers have developed automated tools for assessing the readability of health texts by substituting difficult terms with easier synonyms and simplifying long sentences [ 18 ] or by comparing the terms appeared in a document and terms known by the user [ 19 ]. Another study to improve the availability of consumer-friendly information is the consumer health educational project by European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI) [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experiment to rerank search results for people with lower topic familiarity showed that the classifier was effective: the portion of introductory pages at the top 5 and top 10 result sets using this method were significantly higher than those in the baseline run using a default search engine ranking. Paukkeri, Ollikainen, and Honkela () recognize that different users have different levels of DK, and documents are written differently for people with such differences. Documents intended for professionals may not be understandable at all by a novice user and documents for novice users may not contain all the detailed, specific, and in‐depth information needed by an expert.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Gan et al [8] focus on modeling the difficulty of labeling tasks in crowdsourcing instead of single documents. Paukkeri et al [15] propose a method to estimate a document's subjective difficulty for each user separately based on comparing a document's terms with the known vocabulary of an individual. Sameki et al model tweet difficulty in the context of crowdsourcing [19] where they devise a system that minimizes the labeling costs for micro-tasks by allocating more budget to difficult tweets and less to easy ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%