2021
DOI: 10.30918/aerj.94.21.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing van Hiele’s geometric thinking levels among elementary pre-service mathematics teachers

Abstract: Teachers’ geometric thinking is crucial to teaching efficacy in geometry since teacher knowledge or thinking serves as a basis for the quality of instruction provided for students’ learning. Teachers’ thinking about geometry has attracted much attention among mathematics education researchers. This study therefore aimed at assessing elementary pre-service teachers’ geometric thinking within the first three levels of van Hiele’s model. The study was guided by three objectives. The objectives were to (1) assess … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(analisis), level 3 (deduksi informal), level 4 (deduksi), dan level 5 (mahir) (Bonyah & Larbi, 2021;Celik & Yilmaz, 2022;Salifu et al, 2018;Siew et al, 2013). Kelima tingkatan berpikir geometri dicpai oleh peserta didik secara hierarkis dari tingkatan terendah level 1 menuju tingkatan tertinggi level 5.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…(analisis), level 3 (deduksi informal), level 4 (deduksi), dan level 5 (mahir) (Bonyah & Larbi, 2021;Celik & Yilmaz, 2022;Salifu et al, 2018;Siew et al, 2013). Kelima tingkatan berpikir geometri dicpai oleh peserta didik secara hierarkis dari tingkatan terendah level 1 menuju tingkatan tertinggi level 5.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…In a similar study, driven by the fact that teachers' geometric thinking influences their teaching efficacy of geometry, Bonyah and Larbi (2021) assessed Ghanaian pre-service mathematics teachers' geometric thinking levels within the first three van Hiele levels, the exact content they would be teaching. The study was quantitative in nature and used a descriptive survey design.…”
Section: Geometry Education In Ghanamentioning
confidence: 99%