2005
DOI: 10.1192/pb.29.4.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing violence risk in general adult psychiatry

Abstract: We aimed to establish current practice in the risk assessment of harm to others within general adult psychiatry and review risk assessment documentation in use. Consultants working across 66 randomly selected trusts across England were surveyed. A qualitative analysis of risk assessment documentation was carried out. RESULTSData were obtained from 45 trusts (68%). Consultants reported that 30 (67%) of the trusts had standardised forms for risk assessment. Forty-one forms were subjected to content analysis. Wid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hitherto there has been just one English study examining this issue in detail (Higgins et al, 2005). Higgins et al asked consultants working in general adult psychiatry in 66 randomly selected mental healthcare providers to provide copies of their trust's RAP and to answer a series of questions about risk assessment documentation, training and guidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitherto there has been just one English study examining this issue in detail (Higgins et al, 2005). Higgins et al asked consultants working in general adult psychiatry in 66 randomly selected mental healthcare providers to provide copies of their trust's RAP and to answer a series of questions about risk assessment documentation, training and guidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of randomly selected Mental Health Trusts in England confirmed uncertainty in practice about how to proceed. 134 The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide 135 is one tool used in specialist clinical practice, founded in data analysis from a Canadian cohort of high-security hospital patients. The HCR-20 136 is based on statistical analysis of the risk literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is inter-trust variability in the use of risk assessment forms, and even where mandatory for in-patients the completion rate can be as low as 61% (Higgins et al, 2005;Stein, 2005). To date, there is lack of an adequate evidence base focusing on factors that could influence the completion of generic risk assessment forms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing expectation on all mental health professionals to identify, appraise and manage risk has led to the introduction of generic risk forms at trust level. Although 67% of trusts have standardised forms for risk assessment, the lack of a gold standard has resulted in striking variation with regards to content, complexity and evidence base (Higgins et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%