2015
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing visual function in children with complex disabilities: the Bradford visual function box

Abstract: The results of this clinical study show that the BVFB is a reliable tool for assessing the visual function in children with severe learning disability in whom other tests fail to elicit a response. The need for a tool which is quick to administer and portable has previously been highlighted. The BVFB offers an option for children for whom other formal tests are unsuccessful in eliciting a response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is considerably lower than headline rates of cooperation reported by other studies [2,4,5]. Pilling [4] reported a rate of 97% cooperation with functional vision assessment which included the use of the Bradford box, a novel visual function instrument [18]. The rate of cooperation with standard tests (Crowded Keeler LogMAR, Crowded Kays pictures and Cardiff Acuity Test) was 62%, a similar proportion to that found in our evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is considerably lower than headline rates of cooperation reported by other studies [2,4,5]. Pilling [4] reported a rate of 97% cooperation with functional vision assessment which included the use of the Bradford box, a novel visual function instrument [18]. The rate of cooperation with standard tests (Crowded Keeler LogMAR, Crowded Kays pictures and Cardiff Acuity Test) was 62%, a similar proportion to that found in our evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Visual acuity was measured using available age and ability-appropriate tests. Tests available included Keeler Preferential Looking Cards [16] Cardiff Acuity Test[17], Bradford Visual Function Box[18] (in year 4 of operating our service), LogMAR linear and single crowded versions of Kay Pictures[19] and Keeler LogMAR Crowded letter test (formerly Glasgow Acuity Cards) [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study found that over a third of children were unable to cooperate or show interest in traditional visual assessment tools but visual function was demonstrated using the BVFB. This tool has been demonstrated by the authors to be a reliable method of assessing vision in children with special needs who lack concentration, cooperation or interest in traditional visual assessment tools 6. While it is not possible to extrapolate object size to Snellen-type acuity, this method of visual assessment has proved useful by nature of the feedback that can be provided to parents and carers in terms of the size of object the child is able to see and at what distance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For children with extremely low levels of vision, qualitative information can be gained from very simple measures of ‘detection vision’ 11 12. Qualitative comments on the child's overall visual performance and a note of any unusual behaviours should be made and explained where possible.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%