2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing wetland habitat vulnerability in moribund Ganges delta using bivariate models and machine learning algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 70% of wetland area has been converted to land, and existing wetlands have undergone into hydrological inconsistency, diminishing water depth, unpredictable water supply, and rising temperatures and all of these are detrimental to the aquatic environment in general and fish habitat in particular (Whitney et al 2020;Pandey et al 2021;Thaman 2021). Wetland loss and hydro-ecological alteration in existing wetland are caused by land use change, agricultural encroachment, built-up extension, fragmentation of wetland, loss of tie channels, and river flow reduction due to damming Islam, et al 2021;Pal & Paul 2020). Wetland is an excellent fishing spot, and a large number of people depend on it for their livelihood (Gosling et al 2017;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 70% of wetland area has been converted to land, and existing wetlands have undergone into hydrological inconsistency, diminishing water depth, unpredictable water supply, and rising temperatures and all of these are detrimental to the aquatic environment in general and fish habitat in particular (Whitney et al 2020;Pandey et al 2021;Thaman 2021). Wetland loss and hydro-ecological alteration in existing wetland are caused by land use change, agricultural encroachment, built-up extension, fragmentation of wetland, loss of tie channels, and river flow reduction due to damming Islam, et al 2021;Pal & Paul 2020). Wetland is an excellent fishing spot, and a large number of people depend on it for their livelihood (Gosling et al 2017;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF reduces the dimensionality in the database by using a built-in feature selection system that can regulate multiple parameters without removing some of them (Tella et al, 2021). By estimating the increase in prediction error in the dataset, RF can compute the variable importance scores of each constituent tree and also the entire database (Elavarasan and Vincent, 2021;Pal and Paul, 2020). Studies like Chan and Paelinckx, (2008) and Pal and Mather, (2003) reported that RF (uses bagging) is more sensitive to noise than the algorithms based on boosting technique.…”
Section: Random Forest Algorithm Uses Bootstrap Aggregation Technique While Growing Multiple Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF reduces the dimensionality in the database by using a built-in feature selection system that can regulate multiple parameters without removing some of them (Tella et al, 2021). By estimating the increase in prediction error in the dataset, RF can compute the variable importance scores of each constituent tree and also the entire database (Elavarasan and Vincent, 2021;Pal and Paul, 2020). Studies like Chan and Paelinckx, (2008) and Pal and Mather, (2003) reported that RF (uses bagging) is more sensitive to noise than the algorithms based on boosting technique.…”
Section: Random Forest Algorithm Uses Bootstrap Aggregation Technique...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML algorithms have the potential to identify the non-linear complex relationship (Mosavi et al, 2018) and eventually produce the spatial model of gully erosion susceptibility based on associated predisposing factors of gully erosion (Saha et al, 2020). Presently the integration of remote sensing and GIS with ML and ensemble algorithms has made the mapping of any environmental issue including gully erosion easier and precise (Saha et al, 2020;Pal and Paul, 2020). For example, Arabameri et al, (2018); used R programming language and GIS technique for assessing gully erosion susceptibility and reported greater performance accuracy and preciseness over the conventional techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%