Sample point based spatial model derived from Machine Learning (ML) algorithms often generalizes the spatial pattern of event. The present study has tried to highlight how far it is acceptable and can it replace pixel based modelling? The present study has presented a comparative view of pixel and sample point based modelling of gully erosion susceptibility of the upper Mayurakshi basin to assess the predictabilities. Random forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and (ADB) were applied for developing pixel and point based models in WEKA and Python software environments respectively. From the models, it is found that 14-25% area located mainly in the upper parts of the study unit is very highly susceptible to gully erosion. Based on the accuracy and performance level using Area under curve (AUC) of Receiver operating curve, sensitivity, precision, F1 score, MCC pixel based ensemble models are superior to point based modelling. Often, the point based models have a very poor agreement with training and testing data. So, pixel based models could not be replaced with point based models. RF is found as the best representative model. The study, therefore, recommends using pixel based modelling for this or a similar purpose. Since the models have figured out the gully erosion susceptible areas, it would be a useful tool for related planning processes.