2015
DOI: 10.1080/17408989.2015.1095871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing with new eyes? Assessment for learning in Norwegian physical education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
11

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
52
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…AfL appears to be a viable solution to these accountability problems. There is some consensus on the potential benefits of the pedagogical approach (see for example Hay and Penney 2013;Leirhaug and Annerstedt 2015;Leirhaug and MacPhail 2015;MacPhail and Halbert 2010;Ní Chróinín and Cosgrave 2013;Penney et al 2009). However, even though many PE teachers in the Western world have started to use AfL, there is still a lack of critical engagement in its possible consequences (Leirhaug and MacPhail 2015;Leirhaug, MacPhail, and Annerstedt 2016).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AfL appears to be a viable solution to these accountability problems. There is some consensus on the potential benefits of the pedagogical approach (see for example Hay and Penney 2013;Leirhaug and Annerstedt 2015;Leirhaug and MacPhail 2015;MacPhail and Halbert 2010;Ní Chróinín and Cosgrave 2013;Penney et al 2009). However, even though many PE teachers in the Western world have started to use AfL, there is still a lack of critical engagement in its possible consequences (Leirhaug and MacPhail 2015;Leirhaug, MacPhail, and Annerstedt 2016).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for a quality PE, the national programme assumes that students must know what is expected from them, what are the learning objectives that are established for them, and what is their distance to such objectives. These principles are in line with the idea of assessment for learning (Leirhaug and Annerstedt 2016). As for other similar standard-based curricula (MacPhail 2015), the Portuguese national PE programme seems sufficiently flexible for allowing schools and teacher to take into consideration the specific schools' and students' characteristics.…”
Section: The Portuguese Pe Programme and Its Summative Assessment Normsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…A central aspect of PE that did not change with the Interest-based PE programme is that PE was delivered and assessed according to the Norwegian PE curriculum and the therein described competence aims (Utdanningsdirektoratet, 2015). However, assessment is described as a troublesome issue in PE (Leirhaug & Annerstedt, 2016;López-Pastor, Kirk, Lorente-Catalán, MacPhail, & Macdonald, 2013;Redelius & Hay, 2012;Svennberg, Meckbach, & Redelius, 2018) and a challenge to students' experiences of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the subject (Krijgsman et al, 2017;Slingerland et al, 2016). Previous research found that students consider "having the right body and sporting ability" (Redelius & Hay, 2012, p. 218) to be a key factor in receiving high grades in PE.…”
Section: Sports Discourse and Assessment In Pementioning
confidence: 99%