2014
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfu022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Within-Household Selection Methods in Household Mail Surveys

Abstract: Household surveys are increasingly moving toward self-administered modes of data collection. To maintain a probability sample of the population, researchers must use probability methods to select adults within households. However, very little experimental methodological work has been conducted on within-household selection in mail surveys. In this study, we experimentally examine four methods-the next-birthday method, the last-birthday method, selection of the youngest adult in the household, and selection of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonprobability methods designed to target younger adults all successfully recruited more young people into the survey than the probability and quasi-probability methods (X 2 (30) = 102.769, p <.001). This finding is consistent with recent within-household selection research (Olson, Stange, and Smyth 2014). However, all methods ultimately significantly underrepresented young people, which is consistent with other work comparing household selection techniques (Battaglia et al 2008) and is not unexpected given the landline frame.…”
Section: Demographicssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nonprobability methods designed to target younger adults all successfully recruited more young people into the survey than the probability and quasi-probability methods (X 2 (30) = 102.769, p <.001). This finding is consistent with recent within-household selection research (Olson, Stange, and Smyth 2014). However, all methods ultimately significantly underrepresented young people, which is consistent with other work comparing household selection techniques (Battaglia et al 2008) and is not unexpected given the landline frame.…”
Section: Demographicssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The most recent birthday method was the least accurate, resulting in errors in nearly 30% of households with two or more members, which is consistent with other research on selection accuracy (Battaglia et al 2008;Olson, Stange, and Smyth 2014). At the other end of the spectrum, the YMYF in household methods, when asked as a single question or a multipart question, resulted in near perfect accuracy rates.…”
Section: Survey Practicesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…mothers/female caregivers who had teens in the age range of 13 to 19 years were randomly selected for the survey. The last-birthday method was applied when one eligible respondent had more than one teen [48]. Thus, a total of 347 respondents (mothers/female caregivers) were interviewed, as illustrated in Figure 2, which presents the strati ed sampling break-down.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mothers/female caregivers who had teens in the age range of 13 to 19 years were randomly selected for the survey. The last-birthday method was applied when one eligible respondent had more than one teen [43]. Thus, a total of 347 respondents (mothers/female caregivers) were interviewed, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%