2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2014.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and analysis of indirect lightning performance of overhead lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by an investigation carried out by Paulino et al [3], which showed that the contribution of subsequent strokes is negligible when compared with the contribution of first strokes. The investigation reported in [3] was based on the simple flashover criterion based on the LIV peak value [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is supported by an investigation carried out by Paulino et al [3], which showed that the contribution of subsequent strokes is negligible when compared with the contribution of first strokes. The investigation reported in [3] was based on the simple flashover criterion based on the LIV peak value [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The current peak value and fronttime follow the probabilistic distribution proposed in [15], with 0.47 correlation coefficient. The 120-m/μs return stroke velocity used is a representative value for indirect lightning flashover assessment [3].…”
Section: Probabilistic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming the impact area of Fig. 1, Monte Carlo simulation can be summarized as: 1) generating random values of lightning flash parameters and coordination of the first stroke lightning stepped leader (x, y) on the impact area; 2) application of an Electro-geometric model (EGM) to determine termination point of impact of each lightning stroke; assuming that the subsequent strokes follow the same path of the first stroke [23]; 3) estimating the overvoltages generated by the lightning strokes, depending on the termination point of impact; 4) calculating the insulation failure risk. The overall process of the proposed method is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Failure Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time step used in this Section is 10 ns, as a reduction to 5 ns caused negligible variation in the results. The calculation is carried out in three steps: (i) compute the E H (k) file from Equation (4); (ii) compute the α(k) file from (1), adding the contribution of the four current components as per Equation (15) and Table 1 or Table 2; (iii) compute E(k) with Equation (18). Alternatively, any convolution tool available in commercial software could be used in this step.…”
Section: Horizontal Electric Field Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%