2021
DOI: 10.5755/j01.eis.1.15.29114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and Development of Public Servants Using the Design Thinking Methodology for the Reforms and Innovations Introduction

Abstract: The purpose of the study is to investigate the features of assessment of public servants’ characteristics and their ability development to introduce reforms and innovations in public authorities using the design thinking methodology. The following tasks were set: 1) to investigate the problems of assessing the personal qualities and behavioral characteristics before and after training activities; 2) to find out what peculiarities of the introduction of reforms and innovations in public authorities should be ta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Design management researcher Best (2006;2015), as well as Borja de Mozota (2003), Lal (2021), Orliv et al (2021) reveal the importance and peculiarities of design thinking. The design product and the principles of its creation are the object of research, analyzed by researchers Bloch (1995), Kuvykaitė (2001), Borja de Mozota and Veryzer (2005), Best (2015), Luchs et al (2015), Brunner (2016), Heufler et al (2020).…”
Section: Level Of Research Of the Work Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design management researcher Best (2006;2015), as well as Borja de Mozota (2003), Lal (2021), Orliv et al (2021) reveal the importance and peculiarities of design thinking. The design product and the principles of its creation are the object of research, analyzed by researchers Bloch (1995), Kuvykaitė (2001), Borja de Mozota and Veryzer (2005), Best (2015), Luchs et al (2015), Brunner (2016), Heufler et al (2020).…”
Section: Level Of Research Of the Work Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%