2020
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10505511.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and Error Analysis of Terra-MODIS and MISR Cloud-top Heights through Comparison with ISS-CATS lidar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even for optically thick high cloud, the MISR cloud top is not located at cloud top as is typically estimated from spaceborne lidar, as has been recently quantified by Mitra et al. (2021). Rather it tends to be located near the altitude where the cloud optical depth reaches one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even for optically thick high cloud, the MISR cloud top is not located at cloud top as is typically estimated from spaceborne lidar, as has been recently quantified by Mitra et al. (2021). Rather it tends to be located near the altitude where the cloud optical depth reaches one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the Tropical Western Pacific for example, optically thin cirrus (typically subvisual cirrus with an optical depth less than 0.3) are ubiquitous near the tropopause (in the tropical transition layer). But high clouds with an optical depth below 0.3 are rarely detected by MISR (Marchand et al., 2007, 2010; Mitra et al., 2021) and are not included in the WCTH statistic. Likewise, where optically thin upper level clouds (optical depths greater than 0.3 but less than about 1–2) overlap lower level clouds, the MISR stereo‐retrieval will often retrieve the CTH of the lower cloud rather than the upper cloud.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%