Life-Cycle of Engineering Systems: Emphasis on Sustainable Civil Infrastructure 2016
DOI: 10.1201/9781315375175-147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and failure test of a prestressed concrete bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is very difficult to obtain its exact value at the time of testing. In addition to the standard analytical evaluation that should be used in all cases, some experimental methods have been verified and applied worldwide [ 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 26 , 27 ]. Nevertheless, these methods provide different results compared to the analytically calculated value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is very difficult to obtain its exact value at the time of testing. In addition to the standard analytical evaluation that should be used in all cases, some experimental methods have been verified and applied worldwide [ 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 26 , 27 ]. Nevertheless, these methods provide different results compared to the analytically calculated value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, other new or additional relevant information can also be desirable and useful, especially regarding the unknown value of a prestressing force that is acting on the structure [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Likewise, several indirect techniques or structural tests can be used, such as the saw-cut method or structural response method [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. These methods are based on observation of the structural behavior after the application of a known load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, we know various direct and indirect approaches for determining the value of residual prestressing force. Commonly, these methods can be categorized according to their impact on the investigated construction or methodology in which the prestressing force is monitored [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. The techniques with no or only a negligible impact on the structure’s integrity are usually considered non-destructive or semi-destructive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the application of indirect methods, such as the saw-cut method (SCM) and structural response method (SRM), leads to the calculation of the prestressing force indirectly from the measured values. Measured quantities can be represented by, e.g., deflection, stress (or strain) release, the width of the cracks, and so on [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Ongoing research in the field of non-destructive prestressing force monitoring is focused, for example, on vibration methods, impedance-based methods, elasto-magnetic methods, acoustic elastic methods, and strain-based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%