2015
DOI: 10.1044/2015_ajslp-14-0028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and Treatment of Cognition and Communication Skills in Adults With Acquired Brain Injury via Telepractice: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Limited findings, lack of diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy data, and heterogeneity of assessments and interventions precluded robust evaluation of clinical implications for telepractice equivalence and the broader area of telepractice efficacy. Future research is needed that will build upon current knowledge through replication. In addition, further evaluation at the impairment and activity limitation/participation restriction levels is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
47
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, telerehabilitation for people with TBI featured in 38 of the included papers (see Table 2), comprising 2 systematic reviews [39,79] Two systematic reviews [39,79] included a total of 26 studies evaluating tele-practice in TBI, support for family members (n = 16), assessment (n = 8), and intervention for cognitive impairment (n = 2). None of the intervention studies provided communication training for participants with a TBI or their communication partners, and the two cognitive intervention studies included only participants with mild cognitive impairments [39,79]. The focus of the controlled trials in the reviews was impairment-based assessment and intervention rather than function, activity limitations, or participation restrictions [39,131].…”
Section: Telerehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, telerehabilitation for people with TBI featured in 38 of the included papers (see Table 2), comprising 2 systematic reviews [39,79] Two systematic reviews [39,79] included a total of 26 studies evaluating tele-practice in TBI, support for family members (n = 16), assessment (n = 8), and intervention for cognitive impairment (n = 2). None of the intervention studies provided communication training for participants with a TBI or their communication partners, and the two cognitive intervention studies included only participants with mild cognitive impairments [39,79]. The focus of the controlled trials in the reviews was impairment-based assessment and intervention rather than function, activity limitations, or participation restrictions [39,131].…”
Section: Telerehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the intervention studies provided communication training for participants with a TBI or their communication partners, and the two cognitive intervention studies included only participants with mild cognitive impairments [39,79]. The focus of the controlled trials in the reviews was impairment-based assessment and intervention rather than function, activity limitations, or participation restrictions [39,131].…”
Section: Telerehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations