2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment approach for calculating transfer alignment accuracy of SINS on moving base

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the slave and master SINS are always positioned at distance from each other, and there will be relative motion between them while the vehicle turns or manoeuvres, this will introduce additional errors into the TA. The TA method based on inertial measurement matching have received extensive attention in recent years 18,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] , which can be depicted in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Transfer Alignment Of Sinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the slave and master SINS are always positioned at distance from each other, and there will be relative motion between them while the vehicle turns or manoeuvres, this will introduce additional errors into the TA. The TA method based on inertial measurement matching have received extensive attention in recent years 18,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] , which can be depicted in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Transfer Alignment Of Sinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this test, the relative attitude between MINS and SINS is invariable since they were rigidly bolted on the steel plate, i.e., can be considered as a constant vector. Therefore, the CKF-based fixed-point smoother was employed in the accuracy assessment procedure, on account of the nonlinear characteristic of the model description [ 27 , 28 ]. As is shown in Figure 13 , the accuracy assessment procedure was initiated at Point B and ended at Point C (700 s), where the GPS functioned well and the Gaussian assumption for the observation noise is accredited.…”
Section: Van Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAE can reflect the possible estimation error range of estimation methods; MRE stands for the ensemble estimation error; and RMSE reflects the sensitivity and extreme value effect of the estimation results. The calculation formulae of these three evaluation criteria are described as follows [25,26]: MAE=1ntruei=1nABSfalse(Xm,iXe,ifalse) MRE=1ntruei=1nfalse[ABSfalse(Xm,iXe,ifalse)/Xm,ifalse] RMSE=1ntruei=1nfalse(Xm,iXe,ifalse)2 where n is the number of the testing points and Xm,i, Xe,i are the measured and estimated gravity disturbance values, respectively. ABS is the symbol of the absolute value function.…”
Section: Numerical Testmentioning
confidence: 99%