2019
DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2019.1645990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment design and quality of inferences in PISA: limitations and recommendations for improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more than two decades, PISA has fueled debates on educational issues, such as assessment, around the world (Caro and Kyriakides, 2019). Social science researchers have long been encouraged to think beyond fixed and nation-state bound categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more than two decades, PISA has fueled debates on educational issues, such as assessment, around the world (Caro and Kyriakides, 2019). Social science researchers have long been encouraged to think beyond fixed and nation-state bound categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous special issue in Assessment in Education, with guest editors Caro and Kyriakides (2019) demonstrated both PISA's limitations and possibilities. In this regular issue, Professor Harvey Goldstein, one of our Executive Editors, has published a critical commentary: PISA and the globalisation of education: A critical commentary on papers published in AIE special issue 4/2019 (Goldstein, this issue).…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recurring issue in the educational community is school failure (de Castro & Pereira, 2019;Fernández-Mellizo & Martínez-García, 2017). The debate about the factors that likely underlie it is refueled every time PISA reports are published (Caro & Kyriakides, 2019;Davis, 2019). However, the paradigm of the intellectual capacity of subjects being solely responsible for school achievement is overcome (Sternberg et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%