2013
DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvt021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
354
0
20

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(408 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
354
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Gunn and Mintrom, 2017;Penfield et al, 2014;Upton et al, 2014) around impact has focused on how it should be measured (in fact, one downside of this has been the lack of attention to other, in some ways more profound, aspects of the question). Even if it were to be shown that impact can be achieved by universities, and that it were desirable for them to achieve it, there are still significant doubts about our ability to identify, assess and evaluate this impact.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gunn and Mintrom, 2017;Penfield et al, 2014;Upton et al, 2014) around impact has focused on how it should be measured (in fact, one downside of this has been the lack of attention to other, in some ways more profound, aspects of the question). Even if it were to be shown that impact can be achieved by universities, and that it were desirable for them to achieve it, there are still significant doubts about our ability to identify, assess and evaluate this impact.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Spaapen et al 2013, p.4) The highlighted words in the various definitions above point out a central and common the idea that what is being sought is a diverse set of tangible benefits for society and the economy. However, this is not to say that there is, necessarily, agreement on the philosophical underpinnings, nor definition of impact (Penfield et al 2014;Greenhalgh et al 2016). While we do not intend to resolve that debate here, we do aim to point out that there is a common thread running through different definitions, and there are a corresponding set of methods and frameworks that have evolved to try and help researchers and policymakers understand impact.…”
Section: The Context For Assessing Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of well-established challenges in assessing the impact from research, principally the interrelated concerns of the sometimes long time lags between research and impact, the problems of attribution of research to impact and the difficulties in providing evidence of the links between research and impact (Bornmann, 2013;Penfield et al, 2014;Greenhalgh et al, 2016). These issues are further complicated by the complex, and potentially non-linear and non-sequential relationship between research and impact.…”
Section: History and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%