2003
DOI: 10.1177/875687050302200403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment in Low-Incidence Disabilities: The Day-to-Day Realities

Abstract: This article addresses issues in assessment of students who are deaf, hard of hearing, blind, and visually impaired in rural school districts, where specially trained personnel may be in short supply. Accommodations and modifications for formal and informal assessment are suggested, changes in service delivery models are recommended, and additional resources are provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Case et al’s (2005) assessment report highlighted the importance of individualising accommodations for each student with a visual impairment, they noted that accommodations for the general assessment of children with disabilities can typically be classified into four broad categories. These categories include (1) changes with regard to presentation, (2) changes with regards to response, (3) changes with regard to timing and scheduling, and (4) changes with regard to setting (Bowen & Ferrell, 2003; Case et al, 2005; Hopper, 2002; McDonnell et al, 1997). Ruiter, Nakken, Janssen, Van der Meulen, and Looijestijn (2011) focused on the adaptive assessment of young children with visual impairments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Case et al’s (2005) assessment report highlighted the importance of individualising accommodations for each student with a visual impairment, they noted that accommodations for the general assessment of children with disabilities can typically be classified into four broad categories. These categories include (1) changes with regard to presentation, (2) changes with regards to response, (3) changes with regard to timing and scheduling, and (4) changes with regard to setting (Bowen & Ferrell, 2003; Case et al, 2005; Hopper, 2002; McDonnell et al, 1997). Ruiter, Nakken, Janssen, Van der Meulen, and Looijestijn (2011) focused on the adaptive assessment of young children with visual impairments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(pp. xi, 2, 218) Assessment must lead to improvements in instruction (Bowen & Ferrell, 2003;Nielsen & Luetke-Stahlman, 2002). Specialized procedures and assessment tools exist that have been designed for children with hearing loss and take into account the different languages that may be involved Cawthon, 2006;.…”
Section: Dh8s1: Administer Assessment Tools Using the Students Prefermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such personnel also consider the interaction of residual vision, additional disabilities, environment, learning strategies, and unique skills needs. Assessment is made more difficult because there are no reliable and valid instruments for students with visual impairment (Bowen & Ferrell, 2003; Ferrell, 2011; Groenveld & Jan, 1992; Hunt, 2001; Miller & Skillman, 2003; Singh, 2004). Children and youth with visual impairments are rarely included as a norming group, test items may be overly reliant on vision, and insufficient information may be provided about adapting test items or scoring.…”
Section: Assessment Of Students With Visual Impairmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%