PsycEXTRA Dataset 2010
DOI: 10.1037/e636872010-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment in Supervision: Initial Development of the Supervisee Needs Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, correlational analysis was used to explore the relationship between supervisory style (SSI; Friedlander & Ward, 1984) and supervisee needs (SNI; Muse-Burke & Tyson, 2010). Positive correlations were found for all three subscales: attractive, ( r = .650, n = 114, p < .01), interpersonally sensitive ( r = .799, n = 114, p < .01), and task-oriented ( r = .267, n = 114, p < .01).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Likewise, correlational analysis was used to explore the relationship between supervisory style (SSI; Friedlander & Ward, 1984) and supervisee needs (SNI; Muse-Burke & Tyson, 2010). Positive correlations were found for all three subscales: attractive, ( r = .650, n = 114, p < .01), interpersonally sensitive ( r = .799, n = 114, p < .01), and task-oriented ( r = .267, n = 114, p < .01).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this study looked at the overall impact of supervision emphasis (SERF-R; Lanning & Freeman, 1994), supervisory style (SSI; Friedlander & Ward, 1984), and supervisory competence (CS Scale; Borders & Leddick, 1987) on supervisee needs (SNI; Muse-Burke & Tyson, 2010). The competency of human skills from the CS Scale (Borders & Leddick, 1987) was found to be the greatest predictor of supervisee needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generic measures can complement CBT-specific measures to good effect. Again, there is an increasing number which have been developed including those that focus on the identification of supervisee needs (Muse-Burke & Tyson, 2010); supervisory styles (Friedlander & Ward, 1984); the supervisory working alliance (Efstation et al 1990) and a group supervision scale (Arcinue, 2002).…”
Section: How Do Cbt Supervisors Need To Develop?mentioning
confidence: 99%