2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.05.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a simplified set of momentum closure relations for low volume fraction regimes in STAR-CCM+ and OpenFOAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OpenFOAM is an excellent CFD analysis tool based on the finite volume method and written with C++ [ 18 ]. Many researchers are using OpenFOAM to perform complex flow simulations thanks to its editable solver and flexibility in governing equation settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…OpenFOAM is an excellent CFD analysis tool based on the finite volume method and written with C++ [ 18 ]. Many researchers are using OpenFOAM to perform complex flow simulations thanks to its editable solver and flexibility in governing equation settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LES model could predict the fluid more accurately than RANS, but with a higher requirement for calculation resources [ 25 ]. The MYRRHA project [ 17 ] and Sugrue [ 18 ] recommended to use the k-epsilon model for two-phase LBE flow simulations. Therefore, we considered it to be suitable for the studies performed in this paper [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed knowledge of the behavior and size distribution of bubbles is essential for the accurate prediction of boiling, three dimensional void fraction distribution and evolution of the flow regime in boiling flows. Given its impact on nuclear reactor thermal hydraulics, a significant amount of recent research has been focused on improving our understanding of, and predictive capability for, gas-liquid bubbly flows (Mimouni et al, 2010(Mimouni et al, , 2015Hosokawa et al, 2014;Colombo and Fairweather, 2015;Hazuku et al, 2016;Lucas et al, 2016;Sugrue et al, 2017;Liao et al, 2018;Lubchenko et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the present time, the most often adopted strategy consists in adding specific source terms to the turbulence model equations to account for bubble-induced turbulence. Although significant advances have been made in recent years, particularly in modeling based on the conversion of energy from drag to turbulence kinetic energy in bubble wakes (Troshko and Hassan, 2001;Rzehak and Krepper, 2013;Ma et al, 2017;Magolan et al, 2017), turbulence modeling still often relies on the eddy viscosity assumption (Yao and Morel, 2004;Rzehak and Krepper, 2013;Sugrue et al, 2017;Liao et al, 2018). In contrast, second moment closures have only been applied in a few studies (Lopez de Bertodano et al, 1990;Lahey et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This role of the continuous phase turbulence had been rarely considered in previous works, in which multiphase extensions of single-phase linear eddy viscosity models had generally been applied. To provide some examples, Troshko and Hassan (2001), Yao and Morel (2004) and Sugrue et al (2017) have adopted multiphase extensions of the k-model, while Rzehak and Krepper (2013) and Liao et al (2015) employed the SST kmodel. These works, in view of the intrinsic limitations of eddy viscosity-based turbulence models, were unable to correctly predict the three-dimensional turbulence structure and its influence on the void fraction distribution, in particular when, as is often done in single-phase simulations, the turbulence kinetic energy is added to the pressure field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%