2018
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201800084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a Thermally Modified Cellulose Acetate Forward‐Osmosis Membrane Using Response Surface Methodology

Abstract: Cellulose acetate (CA) flat sheet membranes were fabricated and evaluated in a forward-osmosis process. Effects of CA concentration, coagulation bath temperature, and annealing thermal treatment on both membrane structure and performance were investigated. NaCl rejection of the optimum membrane was determined utilizing a reverse-osmosis setup based on conductivity measurements. Two validated models were obtained by means of response surface methodology based on Box-Behnken design. The optimum operating pressur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…J s is the reverse salt flux (g m -2 h -1 ), ΔC t denotes the concentration difference of CaCl 2 between initial and final FS (g L -1 ), and m f is the permeated water weight (kg). It should be noted that for calculating the concentration of CaCl 2 permeating to the FS, the conductivity of the feed solution was measured by electrical conductivity (LEYBOLD 666222, Germany) and converted to salt concentration via calibration curve [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J s is the reverse salt flux (g m -2 h -1 ), ΔC t denotes the concentration difference of CaCl 2 between initial and final FS (g L -1 ), and m f is the permeated water weight (kg). It should be noted that for calculating the concentration of CaCl 2 permeating to the FS, the conductivity of the feed solution was measured by electrical conductivity (LEYBOLD 666222, Germany) and converted to salt concentration via calibration curve [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24] It has been widely used to develop reverse osmosis (RO), 25 nanofiltration (NF), 26 ultrafiltration (UF) 27 and microfiltration (MF) [28][29] membranes by the standard phase reversal method and has been the subject of several studies. 30 The disadvantage of cellulose acetate membranes is that they are sensitive to chemical agents (high pH, temperature, oxidants) and have low mechanical strength. Polysulfone PSf is a widely used membrane material due to its many advantages, its chemical and mechanical resistance, and its application in a wide pH range of pH2-12.…”
Section: A Review On Ca/psf Membranes For Water Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the cellulose acetate (CA) membrane annealed in a bath at 80 °C for 15 min was evaluated by Zyaie et al, 30 using a reverse osmosis (RO) set-up. The best results were obtained for the membrane prepared under the influence of an annealing treatment with a concentration of 20% CA at a coagulation bath temperature (CBT) of 23 °C.…”
Section: A Review On Ca/psf Membranes For Water Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations