“…The reasons for the high risk of bias ratings included convenience sampling, inappropriate exclusion criteria for study participants and lack of predefined thresholds for index and reference tests. Eleven studies were conducted in Asia 44,46,47,49,51,60,63,68,70,71,75,78 , ten studies in North America 50,[52][53][54]58,65,66,[72][73][74]77 , eight in South America 43,45,[55][56][57]59,61,62,67,69 and three 48,64,76 in Europe. Twenty-two studies were publicly funded, eight studies did not report their funding 48,49,64,65,68,69,71,76 and two received sponsoring from pharmaceutical companies 57,61 .…”