2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of aflatoxin exposure using serum and urinary biomarkers in São Paulo, Brazil: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
28
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…found no contaminated samples and had similar analytical accuracy with the limit of detection (LoD) ranging from 0.0013 to 0.0025 ng/mL [15,16]; Solfrizzo reports a limit of quantification (LoQ) of 0.02 ng/mL, and only 6% of samples over the LoQ [17]; in the Reggio Emilia study [14], 33% of the samples were over 0.02 ng/mL. Only surveys from industrialized countries with a tropical climate have found similar proportions of contaminated samples, although concentration values of aflatoxins were about ten times lower than those observed in our study [8,[18][19][20][21][22]; similar levels of contamination have been observed only in the surveys conducted in Africa and Asia [23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Even though some results of the 2017 Reggio Emilia survey might suggest a small contribution from occupational exposure, it was clear that other sources of aflatoxins were present for the general population, with the most plausible exposure being food.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…found no contaminated samples and had similar analytical accuracy with the limit of detection (LoD) ranging from 0.0013 to 0.0025 ng/mL [15,16]; Solfrizzo reports a limit of quantification (LoQ) of 0.02 ng/mL, and only 6% of samples over the LoQ [17]; in the Reggio Emilia study [14], 33% of the samples were over 0.02 ng/mL. Only surveys from industrialized countries with a tropical climate have found similar proportions of contaminated samples, although concentration values of aflatoxins were about ten times lower than those observed in our study [8,[18][19][20][21][22]; similar levels of contamination have been observed only in the surveys conducted in Africa and Asia [23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Even though some results of the 2017 Reggio Emilia survey might suggest a small contribution from occupational exposure, it was clear that other sources of aflatoxins were present for the general population, with the most plausible exposure being food.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…The short-term exposure to aflatoxins in humans can be monitored through urine and serum levels of toxin catabolites [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment × day: P = 0.009. lagher, 1994;Jager et al, 2016). Kidneys are larger in chickens that are exposed to AF than in those not exposed to AF (Kubena et al, 1998;Fowler et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on human and animal studies, AFB1-N7-Gua adduct in urine is considered the most reliable short term biomarker, with a halflife of 7.5 hours, for evaluating hazards and exposure to carcinogenic AFB1 (Dohnal et al 2014;Groopman et al 1993;Jager et al 2016;Wild and Turner 2002). Moreover, AFB1-lysine and aflatoxin-albumin adducts are considered as one of the best biomarkers for long term exposure in blood, due to the albumin half-life of 20 days (Jager et al 2016;Leong et al 2012). In this study, amongst all the tested markers urinary AFM1 was found to be very sensitive biomarker for monitoring human exposure to food contaminated with AFB1 (Jager et al 2016).…”
Section: Aflatoxin B1mentioning
confidence: 99%