2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of alluvial trends toward dynamic equilibrium under chronic climatic forcing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 to develop regime equations for how B and h change downstream under conditions of increasing discharge. The present study does not make either limiting assumption and addresses a separate question of how a pristine alluvial channel evolves from a non-equilibrium multi-thread condition to a dynamic equilibrium, single-thread channel under the constraints of constant bank-full discharge and no sediment supply limitations (Tranmer et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2 to develop regime equations for how B and h change downstream under conditions of increasing discharge. The present study does not make either limiting assumption and addresses a separate question of how a pristine alluvial channel evolves from a non-equilibrium multi-thread condition to a dynamic equilibrium, single-thread channel under the constraints of constant bank-full discharge and no sediment supply limitations (Tranmer et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 16 km river segment located along the periphery of the Northern Patagonian Icefield in Chile was divided into five unique geomorphic reaches (Figure 1). Hydraulic, topographic, and grain-size data (Table 2) were collected for 27 cross sections within the study site in order to analyze the downstream progression of the extremal hypotheses toward and away from dynamic equilibrium (Tranmer et al, 2018). Each cross section was evaluated according to its full cross-sectional dimensions and active cross-sectional dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations