Assessment of American College of Rheumatology quality criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a pre–quality criteria patient cohort

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) starter set of quality measures for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an actual patient cohort that preceded publication of the quality measures. Methods. We retrospectively applied the 2006 ACR quality criteria to a prospectively studied cohort of 568 patients with RA treated by 1,932 unique physicians including 255 different rheumatologists between the years 1999 and 2003. Data on performance were obtained from self-report surveys and medical record review within 12 months. Results. At least 1 joint examination was performed in 98% of patients. Patient and physician global assessments were reported for 79% and 74% of patients, respectively. A total of 85% of patients received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). DMARD adjustments were made for 50% of patients in whom increasing disease activity was noted at least once and for 64% of patients in whom increasing disease activity was noted during 2 (of 4) 3-month periods within the year. Compared with self-report surveys, medical records substantially underreported performance on quality measures. Conclusion. The ACR-endorsed quality measures for RA can be assessed using available data sources. When both self-report and medical record data are used, adherence rates, designed to serve as minimum standards of care, were moderate or high for most measures. Prior to using indicators to compare quality across groups, specific strategies for operationalizing measures and for using accurate data sources to assess adherence to the measures should be defined. KEY WORDS. Rheumatoid arthritis; Quality of care.

Cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes: development of a patient-reported outcomes instrument to assess the pattern and severity of clinical disease activity

“…Variability in symptom severity also required aggregation of data collected over relatively long intervals (three weeks) in order to accurately determine trends and potential changes in response to treatment. This approach is common with other diseases with symptoms that may vary from day to day 23,24 .…”

Quality indicators in rheumatoid arthritis care: using measurement to promote quality improvement

“…The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) has taken the responsibility to endorse quality indicators for RA that are evidence based, measurable, acceptable to health providers and implementable in reimbursement structures. In 2006, the ACR released 16 preliminary evidence-based quality indicators for rheumatology that included three indicators for RA 44. Since the ACR starter set, seven RA quality indicators have been endorsed (table 2).…”

Assessment of American College of Rheumatology–Endorsed Quality Indicators in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

“…In addition, the quality of care in RA fell short of the recommended clinical guidelines. [2][3][4] Quality assessments are increasingly being used for a variety of purposes including quality improvement, accountability, and performance-based incentives. Several national and international organizations/societies have developed and are working to develop quality measures in rheumatology.…”