1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07858.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of an on‐line computerized perinatal data collection and information system

Abstract: Summary. An on‐line maternity data collection system has been designed to provide the information required for perinatal audit and to allow many of the letters and forms required for effective communication in pregnancy to be produced automatically. The system meets the requirements of the Korner Committee on Health Services Information and has been approved by the Computer Policy Committee. Pregnancy is followed prospectively from the first antenatal clinic visit until the file is closed 28 days after delive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Computer entry by trained clerks or midwives using online validation, prompting, and standard definitions for clinical measurements, produced high-quality data. 17,18 Each year, data from these local units were downloaded into the St. Mary's Maternity Information System and maintained by the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London. In compliance with Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001, all direct patient identifiers were removed and analyses were performed on a nonattributable data set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer entry by trained clerks or midwives using online validation, prompting, and standard definitions for clinical measurements, produced high-quality data. 17,18 Each year, data from these local units were downloaded into the St. Mary's Maternity Information System and maintained by the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London. In compliance with Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001, all direct patient identifiers were removed and analyses were performed on a nonattributable data set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer entry by trained clerks or midwives, using online validation, prompting, and standard definitions for clinical measurements, produced high-quality data. 17,18 In compliance with Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001 (United Kingdom), direct identifiers such as names, addresses, and hospital numbers were removed from our data set. All analyses were performed on this nonattributable data set, which contains no patient identifiers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides formulating research problems the system automatically prepares the discharge report. [3,6,7,9].…”
Section: Statistikprogrammementioning
confidence: 98%