“…The included studies were from diverse regions globally, with six (18%) conducted in the United States 2,11–15 and 28 (82%) studies in other countries (Africa, n = 1 [3%]; Asia, n = 15 [44%]; Oceania, n = 2 [6%]; Europe, n = 4 [12%]; Middle East, n = 4 [12%]; Central America, n = 1 [3%]; South America, n = 1 [3%]) 16–43 (Figure S2). Majority ( n = 21, 62%) 2,11,12,16,18,19,21,25,26,28–35,38,39,42,43 of studies utilized standard culture methods, while a smaller number ( n = 8, 24%) 13,14,20,22–24,27,41 of studies reported on newer methods such as metagenomic sequencing and PCR diagnostics (i.e., qPCR [including singleplex and multiplex], 22,23 panfungal real‐time PCR, 27 16S rRNA gene PCR, 23,24 respiratory viral panel PCR, 13,20,41 and Pneumocystis jirovecii PCR 20 ). Other assessed tests or studies included histopathology examination, 15 Aspergillus galactomannan antigen assay (GM), 15,17,20,27 (1‐3)‐β‐D‐glucan assay (BDG), 15,27 and procalcitonin and C‐reactive protein biomarkers 37 .…”