2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of auditory processing in childhood dysphonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The novelty of this study is the characterisation of the voice of Polish children with vocal nodules from within a large group of early school-age children. The research conducted here, and in the literature, demonstrate that diagnosing and treating the voice of a child needs to be done differently than in an adult [15][16][17]. Children have different anatomical structures and environmental factors; they also differ in terms of maturation of the central nervous system and psychological profiles, and one must consider the huge role of emotional and cognitive factors at this age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The novelty of this study is the characterisation of the voice of Polish children with vocal nodules from within a large group of early school-age children. The research conducted here, and in the literature, demonstrate that diagnosing and treating the voice of a child needs to be done differently than in an adult [15][16][17]. Children have different anatomical structures and environmental factors; they also differ in terms of maturation of the central nervous system and psychological profiles, and one must consider the huge role of emotional and cognitive factors at this age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The sourced literature also identifies some aspects of voice evaluation that are not routinely included in paediatric voice clinics. Detailed examination of auditory processing using two methods (Frequency Pattern Test [62] and Duration Pattern Test [63]) yields significantly weaker judgments of pitch and auditory stimuli in dysphonic children ( n = 331) compared to age matched nondysphonic children ( n = 213) [51 ▪ ].…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%