1999
DOI: 10.1097/00001577-199901120-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Balance Abilities in Pakistani Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
77
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
77
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The TUG test values stratified by age intervals and presented in Table can be used as normative values for the paediatric population. Previous studies showed TUG data in children from Pakistan and the USA . In general, the TUG values of children of the same age group in our sample were similar to those presented by one each of the USA and Pakistan studies, without any differences higher than 0.8 seconds in the mean.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The TUG test values stratified by age intervals and presented in Table can be used as normative values for the paediatric population. Previous studies showed TUG data in children from Pakistan and the USA . In general, the TUG values of children of the same age group in our sample were similar to those presented by one each of the USA and Pakistan studies, without any differences higher than 0.8 seconds in the mean.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Previous studies evaluated typically developing children in Pakistan and the USA to determine reference values for functional mobility, but no data have been published on the influence of possible predictive values of the TUG test for healthy adolescents aged 13 to 18 years. For Down syndrome, a small sample of children and adolescents was evaluated using the TUG test, but the walking distance was changed to 9m, making it difficult to compare with other studies .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tallest group (both male and female) had a mean reach of 37.38 cm which is between the published values of 36.60 cm for adult females and 41.83 cm for adult males 1. While previous published studies1,8,10,14 have reported FRT scores by age groups, our results imply that height rather than age, may be more advantageous when using the FRT for discriminative purposes in children. This effect could be significant among youth with medical conditions which affect their growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The Timed "Up and GO" (TUG) test is a performance-based test designed to measure functional or basic mobility [25,35]. The TUG is a valid and reliable measure in children [14,15,35]. The TUG has excellent intrarater (ICC = 0.99) and interrater (ICC = 0.99) reliability [25].…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%