2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1082751/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of bio-based materials for enhanced signal detection of sporozoites using csELISA

Abstract: BackgroundMalaria is responsible for over 435,000 deaths annually, with most cases occurring in sub-Saharan Africa. Detecting the presence of Plasmodium spp. sporozoites (spzs) in the salivary glands of Anopheles vectors of the parasites using the circumsporozoite enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (csELISA) is an important malaria surveillance method. The addition of bio-based materials have shown the potential to improve the adsorption and binding of target antigens and thus can improve the sensitivity and de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the micronutrient concentration in plant dry matter is: boron (2-100 ppm, copper (5-20 ppm), iron (50-150 ppm), molybdenum (0.1-2 ppm), zinc (20-100 ppm), chlorine (0.2-2 %). And the critical levels of deficiency of various micronutrients in plants in India in mg Kg-1 dry matter are boron (20), copper (4 (3-10)), iron (50 (25-30)), molybdenum (0.1), zinc (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), manganese (20 (10-30)).…”
Section: Biopolymers and Agronomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the micronutrient concentration in plant dry matter is: boron (2-100 ppm, copper (5-20 ppm), iron (50-150 ppm), molybdenum (0.1-2 ppm), zinc (20-100 ppm), chlorine (0.2-2 %). And the critical levels of deficiency of various micronutrients in plants in India in mg Kg-1 dry matter are boron (20), copper (4 (3-10)), iron (50 (25-30)), molybdenum (0.1), zinc (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), manganese (20 (10-30)).…”
Section: Biopolymers and Agronomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biopolymers are the greatest eye‐catchers for researchers as compared to synthetic polymers [4] as they are economical, low in toxicity, [5] bio‐degradable, [6] easily available, [7] biocompatible, [8] and are easily modifiable [9–10] . These traits not only safeguard our environment [11] but also enhance their applicability in oral drug delivery, [12] medicine, [13] tissue engineering, [14] wastewater treatment, [15] and the agricultural sector [16] . On the other hand, synthetic polymers usually employ non‐renewable feedstock, may release toxins, and lead to environmental degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%