2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of brewing attitude of unmalted cereals and pseudocereals for gluten free beer production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Montenegro (2016) reported that using amaranth malt produces a degree of 4.9% alcohol in beer elaboration, ranging in the values of strong beers (4.8%-5.5%). 40% of amaranth final product result were acceptable in physicochemical, and sensorial tests, while unmalted amaranth results in the least appreciated by consumers (Cela et al, 2022).…”
Section: Amaranth Beermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the other hand, Montenegro (2016) reported that using amaranth malt produces a degree of 4.9% alcohol in beer elaboration, ranging in the values of strong beers (4.8%-5.5%). 40% of amaranth final product result were acceptable in physicochemical, and sensorial tests, while unmalted amaranth results in the least appreciated by consumers (Cela et al, 2022).…”
Section: Amaranth Beermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Consumers were asked to describe the sensory profile by selecting all the attributes related to the sample, according to the CATA methodology. The attributes used in CATA questionnaire were selected taking into account the procedure described in a previous study (Cela et al., 2022), the characteristic profile of the “American Pale Ale” beer style (Strong, ), and sensory notes associated with the use of sorghum and quinoa in brewing (Cela et al., 2020; Yang & Gao, 2020). The following 18 sensory attributes were used: related to odor/flavor (malty, grainy, caramel, grassy, floral, fruity, citrus, tropical, alcoholic, woody, off‐odor, and off‐flavor), taste (sweet, bitter, sour, and salty), and mouthfeel (astringent and warming).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, the use of GF cereals or pseudocereals is a safer alternative to produce GF beer. Previous studies aimed at evaluating the final gluten content and the impact on physicochemical and sensory characteristics of beers produced by deglutinization treatments (Cela et al, 2023a;Di Ghionno et al, 2017;Guerdrum & Bamforth, 2012;Watson et al, 2019), or brewed with unconventional GF grains (Cela et al, 2022(Cela et al, , 2023bDe Meo et al, 2011;Kordialik-Bogacka et al, 2018;Yorke et al, 2021). Therefore, thanks to the previous research results, nowadays GF beers are widely marketed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, there is a tendency for the data obtained in this study for proteins to be even smaller for the finished beer. The importance of obtaining low values for the protein content lies in the possibility of analyzing the gluten concentration in these beers, which may be low enough to be characterized as a gluten-free beer, below 20 ppm (Cela et al, 2022;Gasiński et al, 2023;Ledley et al, 2023b), making room for reaching different consumers.…”
Section: Two-factor Interaction Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%