2006
DOI: 10.1159/000095426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Cancer-Related Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compliance to those guidelines was comparable in the 2 groups. Clinical follow-up was also standardised by the guideline of the OCC, which also took into consideration that ratings of symptoms may show discrepancies between physicians and patients [30,31]. Despite consideration of the major imbalances found in the data, results of a non-randomised study have to be interpreted cautiously because documentation of patient characteristics or treatments is limited, and not all variables can be analysed.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compliance to those guidelines was comparable in the 2 groups. Clinical follow-up was also standardised by the guideline of the OCC, which also took into consideration that ratings of symptoms may show discrepancies between physicians and patients [30,31]. Despite consideration of the major imbalances found in the data, results of a non-randomised study have to be interpreted cautiously because documentation of patient characteristics or treatments is limited, and not all variables can be analysed.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%