2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Advocacy and Inclusion Rates of People Living With HIV in Anti–PD1/PDL1 Clinical Trials

Abstract: Key Points Question Has inclusion of people living with HIV in anti–programmed death 1 and anti–programmed death ligand 1 (anti–PD1/PDL1) immunotherapy trials changed during ongoing Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program advocacy efforts by the National Cancer Institute? Findings In this quality improvement analysis of 87 anti–PD1/PDL1 trials approved by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program from January 2014 to May 2019, the proportion of studies including peop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HPV was detected in all the specimens tested in this study, given its high prevalence in SCCA [56]. Therefore, nivolumab has shown an encouraging therapeutic effect in patients with HPV-associated cancer and is worthy of further evaluation in these patients [57]. Ho et al (2018) published a case report that described a robust response to combined therapy with ICIs in HPV-related small cell cancer.…”
Section: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HPV was detected in all the specimens tested in this study, given its high prevalence in SCCA [56]. Therefore, nivolumab has shown an encouraging therapeutic effect in patients with HPV-associated cancer and is worthy of further evaluation in these patients [57]. Ho et al (2018) published a case report that described a robust response to combined therapy with ICIs in HPV-related small cell cancer.…”
Section: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…HPV was detected in all the specimens tested in this study, given its high prevalence in SCCA [ 56 ]. Therefore, nivolumab has shown an encouraging therapeutic effect in patients with HPV-associated cancer and is worthy of further evaluation in these patients [ 57 ].…”
Section: Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated above, this exclusion was due to the fear of side effects related to reestablishing the immunity against HIV and to the concern that this population lacks a sufficient underlying T-cell immunity to benefit from therapy. In the last few years, encouraging trends in the inclusion of PLWHIV in ICI trials have been identified [51,52]. These data have already been collected in a small number of reviews [40][41][42] assessing the safety and efficacy of ICIs in this subgroup of patients with advanced cancer.…”
Section: Safety and Efficacy Of Icis In Plwhivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though PLWHIV are at increased risk of developing several cancers, this population has been historically excluded from clinical trials assessing the efficacy of ICIs, thus inhibiting broad implementation of these therapies among PLWHIV with cancer [ 51 ]. As stated above, this exclusion was due to the fear of side effects related to reestablishing the immunity against HIV and to the concern that this population lacks a sufficient underlying T-cell immunity to benefit from therapy.…”
Section: Safety and Efficacy Of Icis In Plwhivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthcare disparities,2 and lack of knowledge of the safety and efficacy of cancer immunotherapy among PWH, limit access to treatment on this population at risk. Despite the recommendation from the American Society of Clinical Oncology supporting the inclusion of PWH in cancer clinical trials,14 a recent study found that 72.9% of recent cancer immunotherapy trials specifically exclude PWH 15. The data on the use of immunotherapy in PWH diagnosed with cancer are scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%