2020
DOI: 10.3311/ppci.16709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of CFD Model Performance for Flows around a Hydraulic Structure of Complex Geometry

Abstract: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling has become a widely used research tool in the hydraulic engineering community, however, for many problems the numerical model setup and even the selection of the suitable hydrodynamic solver is still a challenging task. This is the case for fine scale analysis of flow features around hydraulic structures of complex geometry, where generation of the 3D grid, application of the correct turbulence modeling approach, or modeling of the free surface all require extensive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the huge calculation time, the 3D hydraulic model is usually used in small areas. It is also often analyzed in areas with apparent vertical flow, such as density current flow, water conservancy facilities, and bridge pier scour [13]. Hu et al [14] evaluated the applicability of flow models with different spatial dimensions in hydraulic characterization solutions with parameters such as free liquid surface, water depth variation, and average velocity in dam breaks under wet and dry conditions, among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the huge calculation time, the 3D hydraulic model is usually used in small areas. It is also often analyzed in areas with apparent vertical flow, such as density current flow, water conservancy facilities, and bridge pier scour [13]. Hu et al [14] evaluated the applicability of flow models with different spatial dimensions in hydraulic characterization solutions with parameters such as free liquid surface, water depth variation, and average velocity in dam breaks under wet and dry conditions, among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%