2005
DOI: 10.4314/wajr.v7i1.34176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Chest Radiographs for Quality Assurance and Radiation Protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ghana is not alone in experiencing these problems: similar findings were also identified in Nigerian hospitals, leading to higher radiation doses in some hospitals. A study in Nigeria in sub‐Saharan Africa ( 22 ) which assessed the accuracy in patient positioning, beam collimation, and identification of radiographs as indicators for quality assurance and radiation protection, showed that positioning and beam collimation contributed to a high percentage of unnecessary radiation dose to the patients in all the participating hospitals. The authors suggested that poor practice of radiation protection exists in the hospitals in Nigeria, and that most patients were at risk of having other parts of the body not involved in the required X‐ray examination exposed to radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghana is not alone in experiencing these problems: similar findings were also identified in Nigerian hospitals, leading to higher radiation doses in some hospitals. A study in Nigeria in sub‐Saharan Africa ( 22 ) which assessed the accuracy in patient positioning, beam collimation, and identification of radiographs as indicators for quality assurance and radiation protection, showed that positioning and beam collimation contributed to a high percentage of unnecessary radiation dose to the patients in all the participating hospitals. The authors suggested that poor practice of radiation protection exists in the hospitals in Nigeria, and that most patients were at risk of having other parts of the body not involved in the required X‐ray examination exposed to radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%