2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61460-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of CO2 Arteriography in Arterial Occlusive Disease of the Lower Extremities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hawkins and Caridi obtained 92% diagnostic angiograms using CO 2 alone 15 . However, in the study by Diaz et al , 17 (24.3%) of 70 CO 2 arteriograms were similar to or better than ICM studies as assessed by reader 1 while reader 2 considered eight (11.4%) CO 2 studies to be as good as the ICM DSA 20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hawkins and Caridi obtained 92% diagnostic angiograms using CO 2 alone 15 . However, in the study by Diaz et al , 17 (24.3%) of 70 CO 2 arteriograms were similar to or better than ICM studies as assessed by reader 1 while reader 2 considered eight (11.4%) CO 2 studies to be as good as the ICM DSA 20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These include hand injection, 15,17 Leveen pressure inflator 13 and dedicated delivery system by Coject (Angiodynamics, Glens Falls, NY, USA) 9,18,19 . The latter equipment is expensive, 13 but reported to be safer 7,19,20 . Kerns et al reported that a lower limit to the volume and rate of injection exists below which the bolus breaks up in the area of the imaging 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because some patients will not have undergone dialysis before creation of the AVF, venography with noniodinated contrast material may be required for preoperative mapping of the veins. CO 2 has shown its value as an alternative contrast agent for evaluating infradiaphragmatic arteries in patients in whom the use of iodinated contrast material is contraindicated, usually because of the high risk of renal toxicity or allergic reactions (3,4). It has also been recommended as a useful alternative contrast agent for venography (5,6), where the use of CO 2 resulted in betterquality images of the upper-limb central veins compared with the use of iodinated contrast material (5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 should not be used as a contrast agent for imaging the coronary artery or the cerebral circulation because of its potential neurotoxicity and likelihood of on coronary artery gas embolism causing myocardial ischemia (6-7. The intracoronary CO 2 injection has a profound effect on the left ventricular function in swine (7). Potential image degradation presents a problem with CO 2 use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%