2016
DOI: 10.5958/2394-2126.2016.00105.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of cranial blood flow in cervical spondylosis patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourteen studies 7,12,17,18,[27][28][29][30]35,39,41,47,49,53 reported no significant hemodynamic changes in any of the included cervical positions, whereas 2 studies 33,43 reported a significant hemodynamic decrease in all of the included cervical positions. The majority of studies reported no significant hemodynamic changes during maximum rotation (n = 16).…”
Section: Hemodynamic Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Fourteen studies 7,12,17,18,[27][28][29][30]35,39,41,47,49,53 reported no significant hemodynamic changes in any of the included cervical positions, whereas 2 studies 33,43 reported a significant hemodynamic decrease in all of the included cervical positions. The majority of studies reported no significant hemodynamic changes during maximum rotation (n = 16).…”
Section: Hemodynamic Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority (n = 26) 1,2,4,6,7,12,18,19,[27][28][29][30]32,33,35,36,38,40,41,43,44,[47][48][49][50]57 of the 31 included studies used a color duplex sonography device to measure flow velocities and flow volumes. The remaining 5 studies used magnetic resonance angiography (n = 3) 17,52,53 and magnetic resonance imaging (n = 2).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations