2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-s9-s10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of de novoassemblers for draft genomes: a case study with fungal genomes

Abstract: BackgroundRecently, large bio-projects dealing with the release of different genomes have transpired. Most of these projects use next-generation sequencing platforms. As a consequence, many de novo assembly tools have evolved to assemble the reads generated by these platforms. Each tool has its own inherent advantages and disadvantages, which make the selection of an appropriate tool a challenging task.ResultsWe have evaluated the performance of frequently used de novo assemblers namely ABySS, IDBA-UD, Minia, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to providing basic statistics like N50 (the largest contig/scaffold size wherein half of the total assembly size is contained in contigs/scaffolds no shorter than this value), QUAST compares each assembly against the reference genome (in the case of simulations) and generates a number of highly informative quality matrices, such as misassemblies, assembled sequences not present in the reference (and vice versa), and genes recovered in the assembly if the reference genome is annotated. At the end, iWGS ranks all assemblies based on selected matrices in the QUAST report using a previously described weighting strategy (Abbas et al 2014). This ranking, along with the detailed QUAST report, helps users to identify the best overall assembly, as well as the corresponding combination of sequencing strategy and assembly protocol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to providing basic statistics like N50 (the largest contig/scaffold size wherein half of the total assembly size is contained in contigs/scaffolds no shorter than this value), QUAST compares each assembly against the reference genome (in the case of simulations) and generates a number of highly informative quality matrices, such as misassemblies, assembled sequences not present in the reference (and vice versa), and genes recovered in the assembly if the reference genome is annotated. At the end, iWGS ranks all assemblies based on selected matrices in the QUAST report using a previously described weighting strategy (Abbas et al 2014). This ranking, along with the detailed QUAST report, helps users to identify the best overall assembly, as well as the corresponding combination of sequencing strategy and assembly protocol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques constitute a fast and cost-effective way of obtaining whole genome sequences, particularly in eukaryotic organisms with small genomes such as pathogenic fungi (Faino and Bart, 2014). De novo genome assemblies can quickly be achieved with assemblers such as ABySS (Simpson et al, 2009;Gallo et al, 2014;Abbas et al, 2014) (see below:…”
Section: Module 1: Genomic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these assemblies, the assembly with the highest N50 is chosen. The N50 is the length L of the longest contig such that half of the nucleotides in the assembly lie in contigs of length at least L. When the pipeline was implemented the Velvet assembler was chosen because it proved to be robust to a wide range of data sets during testing and has a low computational overhead (Abbas et al 2014) compared to SPAdes (Bankevich et al 2012).…”
Section: Theory and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%