2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-021-02255-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of defoliation and subsequent growth losses caused by Lymantria dispar using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS)

Abstract: Key message TLS scans of three surveys before, during and after gypsy moth gradation, allowed high-resolution tracking of defoliation and subsequent inter-annual growth losses on an individual tree level. Abstract Foliation strongly determines all tree growth processes but can be reduced by various stress factors. Insect defoliation starts at variable times and is one stress factor that may affect photosynthetic processes and cause immediate reactions like… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this investigation, secondary growth loss exhibited a linear relationship with defoliation intensity, culminating in approximately 40 % to 60 % secondary growth loss in severely defoliated trees during the outbreak year. Spongy moth defoliation primarily inhibits secondary tree growth through diminished leaf biomass (Clark et al, 2010;Fajvan and Wood, 1996;Naidoo and Lechowicz, 2001), as reduced photosynthetic leaf area and carbohydrate supply constrain carbon allocation to secondary tree growth, consequently leading to decreased secondary growth (Ferretti et al, 2021;Jacobs et al, 2022;Waring, 1987).…”
Section: Defoliation Significantly Reduces Secondary Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this investigation, secondary growth loss exhibited a linear relationship with defoliation intensity, culminating in approximately 40 % to 60 % secondary growth loss in severely defoliated trees during the outbreak year. Spongy moth defoliation primarily inhibits secondary tree growth through diminished leaf biomass (Clark et al, 2010;Fajvan and Wood, 1996;Naidoo and Lechowicz, 2001), as reduced photosynthetic leaf area and carbohydrate supply constrain carbon allocation to secondary tree growth, consequently leading to decreased secondary growth (Ferretti et al, 2021;Jacobs et al, 2022;Waring, 1987).…”
Section: Defoliation Significantly Reduces Secondary Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aparte de la estructura física de la vegetación(Pascu et al, 2019), con el TLS y en combinación con algoritmos de aprendizaje automático (machine learning) se pueden llegar a cuantificar las perturbaciones de los bosques (Ghizoni, a clasificar especies en el inventario forestal(Othmani et al, 2013), a estimar el índice de área foliar(Huang y Pretzsch, 2010), a detectar el estrés por deficiencia hídrica en los árboles(Jacobs et al, 2021) y a utilizar sus datos como indicador de defoliación de plagas(Jacobs et al, 2022), entre otras muchas aplicaciones directas al ámbito forestal.…”
unclassified